Welcome to the Treehouse Community
Want to collaborate on code errors? Have bugs you need feedback on? Looking for an extra set of eyes on your latest project? Get support with fellow developers, designers, and programmers of all backgrounds and skill levels here with the Treehouse Community! While you're at it, check out some resources Treehouse students have shared here.
Looking to learn something new?
Treehouse offers a seven day free trial for new students. Get access to thousands of hours of content and join thousands of Treehouse students and alumni in the community today.
Start your free trialcleancut
1,218 PointsCalling .sort() method after creating a copy of a list using [:] in Python
I know that I can break sorted_things=favorite_things[:].sort()
into 2 steps to make it pass the test:
sorted_things = favorite_things[:]
sorted_things.sort()
However, why does doing both steps at once using sorted_things=favorite_things[:].sort()
result in an empty list?
Any help would be much appreciated!
favorite_things = ['raindrops on roses', 'whiskers on kittens', 'bright copper kettles',
'warm woolen mittens', 'bright paper packages tied up with string',
'cream colored ponies', 'crisp apple strudels']
slice1 = favorite_things[1:4]
slice2 = favorite_things[5:]
sorted_things=favorite_things[:].sort()
1 Answer
Alexander Davison
65,469 PointsThis is because .sort()
sorts a variable in place, and there's another function called sorted()
that just sorts a list without changing the variable in place. For example; in this code both a
and b
will be the list [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
.
mixed = [3, 4, 2, 5, 1]
a = sorted(mixed) # sorted() doesn't change a variable; it just returns the sorted version of a list
b = mixed[:]
b.sort() # .sort() changes a variable in place, and returns nothing
# Both a and b are the same list, and the mixed list didn't change
sorted_things = favorite_things[:].sort() # Remember, .sort() returns nothing, so sorted_things will be None
I think the challenge is expecting you to use .sort()
.
I hope you get it. ~Alex
cleancut
1,218 Pointscleancut
1,218 PointsAh, I see! Thanks for reminding me that
.sort()
returns nothing!Alexander Davison
65,469 PointsAlexander Davison
65,469 PointsNo problem :)