Welcome to the Treehouse Community

Want to collaborate on code errors? Have bugs you need feedback on? Looking for an extra set of eyes on your latest project? Get support with fellow developers, designers, and programmers of all backgrounds and skill levels here with the Treehouse Community! While you're at it, check out some resources Treehouse students have shared here.

Looking to learn something new?

Treehouse offers a seven day free trial for new students. Get access to thousands of hours of content and join thousands of Treehouse students and alumni in the community today.

Start your free trial

Design Photoshop Foundations Workflow Basics Becoming Non-Destructive

Posted by Unsubscribed User
Unsubscribed User
6,510 Points

Isn't it Smart Object?

I don't get why smart object is not the working answer to this question!

1 Answer

Andrew McCormick
Andrew McCormick
17,730 Points
Andrew McCormick
Andrew McCormick
17,730 Points

the answer is smart object*s* . Notice the plural. I'm surprised it's that picky but grammar does matter.

Unsubscribed User
Unsubscribed User
6,510 Points

"smart objects" worked. I hate that level of html-like insistence on grammar. You know CSS, for example, doesn't understand British? Say, you spelled "centre" for "center" and text-align, nothing happens. :) Thanks, Andrew!