My Solution. Very different, but is it less efficient?

Hey Dan,

Unfortunately, you can't just paste the link to your workspace. Unless you are on-line and currently in that particular workspace, the rest of use will just get the Bummer 404. You can, however, take a 'snapshot' of your workspace and post that.

In programming, there are always many ways to come to the same conclusion. No one is 'more' right than the other. As long as it works in all circumstances, makes sense to you now, makes sense to another coder. will make sense to a 'future' you, and maintains DRY expectations, then your code is correct. (There are probably many other things to consider to, but that the gist of it).

Keep experimenting and Keep Coding! :)

Your code works and you did it in 3 lines. It is a little condensed, but still makes sense and works, except you need to change one thing.

Right now it is returning a random number, but not always within the scope of the user's inputs. This was just a mathematical error and an easy fix.

You are multiplying the lowNumber and highNumber variables, when you should be subtracting the lowNumber from the highNumber to keep the result within the bounds of the low and high choice.

So instead of...

document.write(Math.floor(Math.random() * parseInt(lowNumber*highNumber)+1));

have...

document.write(Math.floor(Math.random() * parseInt(highNumber - lowNumber)+1));

Thank-you for sharing! :)

Ah jeez, my apologies, I'm still getting used to the website, I see what you mean about the "Snapshot" feature. Hopefully I've done it correctly.

https://w.trhou.se/rgcfucympv