Welcome to the Treehouse Community
Want to collaborate on code errors? Have bugs you need feedback on? Looking for an extra set of eyes on your latest project? Get support with fellow developers, designers, and programmers of all backgrounds and skill levels here with the Treehouse Community! While you're at it, check out some resources Treehouse students have shared here.
Looking to learn something new?
Treehouse offers a seven day free trial for new students. Get access to thousands of hours of content and join thousands of Treehouse students and alumni in the community today.
Start your free trialJeremy Justus
2,910 PointsPython - Readable RegEx Variables
While I was able to complete the most recent Python RegEx challenge, I've encountered trouble adhering to PEP20 with the code design itself. I ran into trouble trying to insert the int_count string into my regular expression with the python interpreter complaining. More specifically, both of the ways I found to accomplish what I wanted are rather ugly and cumbersome. It just seems like there should be a simpler, more elegant and pythonic way to achieve this.
import re
# EXAMPLE:
# >>> find_words(4, "dog, cat, baby, balloon, me")
# ['baby', 'balloon']
def find_words(int_count, words_string):
word_list1 = re.findall(
r"\w{}".format("{" + str(int_count) + ",}"), words_string)
# OR, alternatively:
word_list2 = re.findall(
(r"\w{" + str(int_count) + ",}"), words_string)
print(word_list2)
return word_list2
find_words(4, "dog, cat, baby, balloon, me")
In the code above, both word_list1 and word_list2 return the list that the challenge expects. But they're both so cumbersome, and would be a headache to decipher if I came back to the code a few days later. Is there a simpler way to achieve this that I'm overlooking?
2 Answers
mrben
8,068 PointsOne way might be to use string formatting rather than concatenating strings to form your regex pattern.
For example:
import re
# EXAMPLE:
# >>> find_words(4, "dog, cat, baby, balloon, me")
# ['baby', 'balloon']
def find_words(int_count, words_string):
word_list3 = re.findall(r"\w{%d}" % int_count, words_string)
return word_list3
print find_words(4, "dog, cat, baby, balloon, me")
justlevy
6,326 PointsHere's my solution using the newer 'f string formatting combined with raw strings'.
- the triple curly braces stump me. Maybe someone can help me understand why?
import re
def find_words(digit, str):
result = re.findall(fr"\w{{{digit},}}", str)
print(result)
return result
find_words(3, "June, gloom, on, of, at, fog")
Jeremy Justus
2,910 PointsJeremy Justus
2,910 PointsAhh, thank you. That is much, much more readable than either of my two examples above.
Oleh Kalyuzhnyy
1,874 PointsOleh Kalyuzhnyy
1,874 PointsThis work for 2.x version not for 3.x, my variant for 3.x looks like that:
'''<p>def find_words(int_count,words_string):</p> <p> Â Â Â Â return re.findall(r'\w{'+str(int_count)+',}', words_string)</p>'''
mrben
8,068 Pointsmrben
8,068 PointsIt's the print function that breaks in Py3, the actual find_words function still works in Python 3. See http://i.imgur.com/X5IXc96.png
Oleh Kalyuzhnyy
1,874 PointsOleh Kalyuzhnyy
1,874 PointsMust be you right,but Kenny didn't give this kind of formatting in lessons or i missed this
ericb2
11,429 Pointsericb2
11,429 PointsA variation is to make use of python 3 string formatting:
"If you need to include a brace character in the literal text, it can be escaped by doubling: {{ and }}."
for example
Ron Chan
10,987 PointsRon Chan
10,987 PointsThanks Ben, that code helped a lot. I believe there should also be a comma behind the '%d' like this: {%d,}.
Is there a name for the way you pass the argument into a string using the % sign? I would like to review that video again but I cannot recall which one it was that mentioned this.