Welcome to the Treehouse Community
Want to collaborate on code errors? Have bugs you need feedback on? Looking for an extra set of eyes on your latest project? Get support with fellow developers, designers, and programmers of all backgrounds and skill levels here with the Treehouse Community! While you're at it, check out some resources Treehouse students have shared here.
Looking to learn something new?
Treehouse offers a seven day free trial for new students. Get access to thousands of hours of content and join thousands of Treehouse students and alumni in the community today.
Start your free trialJennifer Hsueh
648 Pointstried to answer it 2 ways and they both work...
I'm curious why I can complete the task using
grocery_item.values_at("bread") grocery_list = ["Bread"]
OR
grocery_item.values_at("item") grocery_list = ["Bread"]
if i'm looking for the VALUE of the key "item", shouldn't I have to insert "item" there?
use: grocery_item.values_at("item")
and NOT: grocery_item.values_at("bread")
??
grocery_item = { "item" => "Bread", "quantity" => 1, "brand" => "Treehouse Bread Company" }
grocery_item.has_value?("Bread")
grocery_item.store("food", true)
grocery_item.values_at("item")
grocery_list = ["Bread"]